Comparative Analysis of Web OPAC Features Interface SLiMS and INLISLite Opensource Based Automation System

Read 2 min

Ach. Nizam Rifqi

(Polinema Library)

This study analyzes the level of completeness of the web OPAC interface features provided by the SLiMS and INLIS Lite automation systems in the Polinema Library and Brawijaya Malang Central Library. The research method used is descriptive quantitative research with a checklist analysis model. The basis for assessing the web OPAC interface is the indicator points proposed by B. Ramesh Babu and Ann O’Brien with 15 indicator items and 91 items. Overall the total comparison between the two OPACs is 62:65 with a percentage of 67%: 76%. Based on the results of the comparison, it can be said that the completeness of the OPAC INLISLite features which are implemented in the Central Library of Brawijaya Malang provides more complete features compared to the SLiMS OPAC in the Polinema Library.

  • References
    Chowdhury. 2004. Introduction to modern information retrieval. 2nd Ed. London, Facet Publishing.
  • Hamim, M. (2012). Database Migration from CDS / ISIS to SLIMS. PUSTAKALOKA: Journal of Information and Library Studies STAIN Ponorogo, 4 (1), 73-93.
  • Hasugian, Jonner. 2001. Library Catalog: From Manual Catalog To Online Catalog (OPAC). Medan: UPT USU Library.
  • Kumar, Shiv & Bansal, Jivesh. 2013. Evaluation and Comparison of Features of OPACs in University Libraries of Chandigarh and Punjab (India). IASLIC Bulletin, 57 (3): 157-169, (Online) http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/02640471311299128, accessed on 26 July 2017.
  • Mufid & Zuntriana, Ari. 2015. Malang Inter Library Loan (MILL) Program: towards the Consortium of State University Institutional Repositories in Malang City. Presented at the 8th Indonesian Digital Library Conference 5-6 November 2016, 1-20, (Online) http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/459/1/KPDI8%20%5BMufid-Ari%20Zuntriana% 5D.pdf, accessed on 22 July 2017.
  • Ramesh Babu, B. & O’Brien, Ann. 2000. Web OPAC Interfaces: an overview, The Electronic Library, 316-327. doi: 10.1108 / 0264047001035457-2, (Online)
  • http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/02640470010354572, accessed on 26 July 2017.
  • Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. 1999. Modern Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press.
  • Wahyu, Supriyanto & Muhsin, Ahmad. 2008. Library Information Technology. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.